Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XT and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (106.0GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (85W vs 215W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 XT
0.476 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 360 OEM +238%
1.613 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
May 2015
Radeon R600
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
828 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
106.0GB/s
Bandwidth
104.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
768
16
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
11.89 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
475.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

215W
TDP
85W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Tobago
R600 XT (215RGMDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy