Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT vs NVIDIA RTX A400

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT vs NVIDIA RTX A400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XT and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (106.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 215W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 XT
0.476 TFLOPS
RTX A400 +468%
2.706 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Apr 2024
Radeon R600
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
828 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
106.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
320
Shading Units
768
16
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
11.89 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
475.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS

Board Design

215W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
GA107
R600 XT (215RGMDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy