Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX vs AMD FirePro W9100

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX vs AMD FirePro W9100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XTX and 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (240W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 106.0GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 XTX
0.476 TFLOPS
FirePro W9100 +1000%
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2014
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
828 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
512bit
106.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
2816
16
TMUs
176
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
11.89 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
-
-
-
475.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

240W
TDP
275W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Hawaii
R600 XTX A11 (215RGMDKA11FG)
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy