Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XTX and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 106.0GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (90W vs 240W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 XTX
0.476 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +498%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2020
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
828 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
106.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
320
Shading Units
896
16
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
11.89 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
475.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

240W
TDP
90W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
TU106
R600 XTX A11 (215RGMDKA11FG)
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy