Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XTX and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX 's Advantages
104 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 106.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (182W vs 240W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 XTX
0.476 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 +12%
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Sep 2008
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
828 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
448bit
106.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
320
Shading Units
216
16
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
11.89 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
475.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

240W
TDP
182W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
GT200
R600 XTX A11 (215RGMDKA11FG)
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy