Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XTX and 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 16 MB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (106.0GB/s vs 2.656GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 240W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon R600
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
828 MHz
Memory Clock
166 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
106.0GB/s
Bandwidth
2.656GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
-
16
TMUs
2
16
ROPs
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.0 MPixel/s
11.89 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.0 MTexel/s
-
-
-
475.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-

Board Design

240W
TDP
15W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
VSA-101
R600 XTX A11 (215RGMDKA11FG)
GPU Variant
Daytona (355-0025-221)
TeraScale
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
180 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
6.0
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
1.1
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy