Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 3470 vs AMD FirePro W9000

ATI Radeon HD 3470 vs AMD FirePro W9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 3470 and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 3470 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
2008 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 3470
0.064 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000 +6140%
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
950 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
15.20GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
2048
4
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
64.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
274W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Tahiti
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy