Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 3850 AGP vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

ATI Radeon HD 3850 AGP vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 3850 AGP and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 3850 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 52.99GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 3850 AGP
0.428 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive +695%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Nov 2012
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
828 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
52.99GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1792
16
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
10.69 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
427.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
85.50 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
375W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
Tahiti
RV670 PRO (215-0708003)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy