Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4200 IGP vs ATI Radeon HD 3300 IGP

ATI Radeon HD 4200 IGP vs ATI Radeon HD 3300 IGP

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon HD 4200 IGP and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon HD 3300 IGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 4200 IGP 's Advantages
Released 1 years late

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4200 IGP
0.04 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 3300 IGP
0.04 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2009
Release Date
Aug 2008
TeraScale IGP
Generation
TeraScale IGP
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
2
Compute Units
2
40
Shading Units
40
4
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
40.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
40.00 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RS880
GPU Name
RS780
-
GPU Variant
RS780D
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
-
Foundry
-
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
Motherboard Dependent
Outputs
Motherboard Dependent
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.0
OpenCL
1.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy