Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4250 vs NVIDIA A30 PCIe

ATI Radeon HD 4250 vs NVIDIA A30 PCIe

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4250 and 24GB VRAM A30 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 4250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 165W)
NVIDIA A30 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 6.336GB/s)
3544 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4250
0.048 TFLOPS
A30 PCIe +21400%
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2009
Release Date
Apr 2021
Radeon R600
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
396 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
6.336GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
40
Shading Units
3584
4
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
2.376 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
47.52 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
165W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
GA100
RV620 LE
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
4.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy