Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB

ATI Radeon HD 4250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4250 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 4250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock928MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 6.336GB/s)
2840 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4250
0.048 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB +11035%
5.345 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2009
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
875 MHz
-
Boost Clock
928 MHz
396 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.336GB/s
Bandwidth
336.6GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
2880
4
TMUs
240
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.68 GPixel/s
2.376 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.7 GTexel/s
-
-
-
47.52 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.345 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
222.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
GK110B
RV620 LE
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy