Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4250 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2

ATI Radeon HD 4250 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4250 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 4250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 580W)
AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 6.336GB/s)
2776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4250
0.048 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290X2 +11633%
5.632 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2009
Release Date
Jun 2014
Radeon R600
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
396 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
6.336GB/s
Bandwidth
345.6GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
2816
4
TMUs
176
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
2.376 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
176.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
47.52 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.632 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
704.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
580W
200 W
Suggested PSU
950 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
4x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Hawaii
RV620 LE
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy