Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4250 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

ATI Radeon HD 4250 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4250 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 4250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 6.336GB/s)
2776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4250
0.048 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +24900%
12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2009
Release Date
Feb 2024
Radeon R600
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
396 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.336GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
40
Shading Units
2816
4
TMUs
88
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
2.376 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
47.52 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
AD107
RV620 LE
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy