Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4350 AGP vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

ATI Radeon HD 4350 AGP vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4350 AGP and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 4350 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 10.40GB/s)
1712 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4350 AGP
0.096 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive +3446%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Nov 2012
Radeon R700
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
10.40GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
1792
8
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
96.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
375W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV710
GPU Name
Tahiti
RV710 (215-0725016)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy