Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4350 AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2

ATI Radeon HD 4350 AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4350 AGP and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 4350 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1072MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 10.40GB/s)
1072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4350 AGP
0.096 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760 X2 +2472%
2.47 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Nov 2013
Radeon R700
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1006 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1072 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
10.40GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
1152
8
TMUs
96
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.73 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.9 GTexel/s
-
-
-
96.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.470 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
102.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
3x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV710
GPU Name
GK104
RV710 (215-0725016)
GPU Variant
GK104-225-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy