Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition

ATI Radeon HD 4350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4350 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 4350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 195W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1058MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1456 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4350
0.096 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition +3285%
3.25 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Apr 2013
Radeon R700
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1006 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1058 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
1536
8
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.86 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
96.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.250 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
135.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
195W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.0
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV710
GPU Name
GK104
RV710 (215-0725016)
GPU Variant
GK104-400-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy