Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4670 AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

ATI Radeon HD 4670 AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 4670 AGP and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 4670 AGP 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
104 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (59W vs 171W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4670 AGP
0.48 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 +11%
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2009
Release Date
Nov 2008
Radeon R700
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
320
Shading Units
216
32
TMUs
72
8
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

59W
TDP
171W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
GT200B
RV730 XT (215-0719047)
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy