Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4670 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

ATI Radeon HD 4670 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4670 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 4670 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 80W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4670
0.48 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +493%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Jul 2020
Radeon R700
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
320
Shading Units
896
32
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

59W
TDP
80W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
TU116
RV730 XT (215-0719047)
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy