Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2

ATI Radeon HD 4750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4750 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 4750 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4750 +95%
0.934 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2009
Release Date
Jul 2008
Radeon R700
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
640
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
23.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
-
-
-
934.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
186.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
182W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV740
GPU Name
GT200B
RV740 PRO
GPU Variant
G200-103-B3
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.826 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
137 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy