Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4850 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

ATI Radeon HD 4850 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4850 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 4850 's Advantages
560 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (110W vs 219W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (127.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4850 +60%
1 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Feb 2010
Radeon R700
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
800
Shading Units
240
40
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

110W
TDP
219W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
G92B
RV770 PRO (215-0669065)
GPU Variant
G92-421-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy