CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
VS
ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 4870 X2 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 286W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4870 X2
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+268%
4.416 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4870 X2
VS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Graphics Card
Aug 2008
Release Date
Nov 2019
Radeon R700
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1725 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
20
10
Compute Units
-
800
Shading Units
1280
40
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.20 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
138.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.832 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.416 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
138.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
R700
GPU Name
TU116
R700 XT (215-0669045)
GPU Variant
TU116-250-KA-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Board Design
286W
TDP
100W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
2
ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT X2
3
ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
4
ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs AMD Radeon HD 6850
5
ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
6
ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
7
ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
8
ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs AMD FirePro S7150
9
ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs AMD Radeon RX 580X
10
ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy