Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 5670 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

ATI Radeon HD 5670 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 5670 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 5670 's Advantages
Lower TDP (64W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2416 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 5670
0.62 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +1835%
12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Feb 2024
Evergreen
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
400
Shading Units
2816
20
TMUs
88
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
15.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
620.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

64W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
AD107
Redwood XT (215-0757002)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy