Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 5770 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

ATI Radeon HD 5770 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 5770 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (90W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 5770
1.36 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +109%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
Jun 2020
Evergreen
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
800
Shading Units
896
40
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

13.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
34.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
1360 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
90W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Juniper
GPU Name
TU106
Juniper XT (215-0754013)
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.04 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
166 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy