Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 5870 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

ATI Radeon HD 5870 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 5870 Mac Edition and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 5870 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 228W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 5870 Mac Edition +407%
2.72 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Sep 2008
Evergreen
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1195 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
153.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
1600
Shading Units
216
80
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.720 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
544.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

228W
TDP
182W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
GT200
Cypress XT (215-0735033)
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy