Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 6930 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

AMD Radeon HD 6930 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 6930 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 6930 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1064 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 186W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 6930 +258%
1.92 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2011
Release Date
Nov 2008
Northern Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
1280
Shading Units
216
80
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

24.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
60.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.920 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

186W
TDP
171W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
GT200B
Cayman CE (215-0807105)
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy