Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 6930 vs AMD Radeon R9 280

AMD Radeon HD 6930 vs AMD Radeon R9 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 6930 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 6930 's Advantages
Lower TDP (186W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 6930
1.92 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280 +74%
3.344 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2011
Release Date
Mar 2014
Northern Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
827 MHz
-
Boost Clock
933 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

24.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.86 GPixel/s
60.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.920 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.344 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
836.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

186W
TDP
200W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
Tahiti
Cayman CE (215-0807105)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
TeraScale 3
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy