Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 6950 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

AMD Radeon HD 6950 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon HD 6950 and 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (185W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 6950
2.253 TFLOPS
CMP 40HX +237%
7.603 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Feb 2021
Northern Islands
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1470 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

22
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
36
1408
Shading Units
2304
88
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

25.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
70.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
2.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
563.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
185W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
TU106
Cayman PRO (215-0807019)
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy