Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 6950 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

AMD Radeon HD 6950 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon HD 6950 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (190W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 6950
2.253 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285 +46%
3.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Sep 2014
Northern Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

22
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1408
Shading Units
1792
88
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

25.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
70.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
2.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
563.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
190W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
Tonga
Cayman PRO (215-0807019)
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
TeraScale 3
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
5 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy