Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost vs AMD FirePro S9150

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Boost and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost 's Advantages
Boost Clock925MHz
Lower TDP (200W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 7950 Boost
3.315 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150 +52%
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Aug 2014
Southern Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
512bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
2816
112
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
103.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.315 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
828.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
235W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Hawaii
Tahiti PRO2 (215-0821282)
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy