Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost vs ATI FirePro V4800

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost vs ATI FirePro V4800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Boost and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
1392 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 7950 Boost +434%
3.315 TFLOPS
FirePro V4800
0.62 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2010
Southern Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
400
112
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.200 GPixel/s
103.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.50 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.315 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
620.0 GFLOPS
828.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

200W
TDP
69W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Redwood
Tahiti PRO2 (215-0821282)
GPU Variant
Redwood XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy