Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 200W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jan 2008
Southern Islands
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
-
112
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

25.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
89.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.867 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
716.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV380
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
130 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Board Design

200W
TDP
20W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy