Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition vs AMD FireStream 9170

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition vs AMD FireStream 9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition +476%
2.867 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Nov 2007
Southern Islands
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
320
112
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

25.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
89.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.867 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
716.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
105W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV670
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy