Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
1696 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition +1094%
2.867 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230 OEM
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Apr 2009
Southern Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
24.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
1792
Shading Units
96
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

25.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
89.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.867 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
716.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

200W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
G92B
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
GPU Variant
G92-159-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy