CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 6250
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 6250
VS
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
AMD Radeon HD 6250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 6250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
1712 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 200W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
+2656%
2.867 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6250
0.104 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
VS
Radeon HD 6250
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Jan 2011
Southern Islands
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
2
1792
Shading Units
80
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
25.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
89.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.867 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
716.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
Cedar
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
GPU Variant
Cedar PRO
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Board Design
200W
TDP
19W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
3
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition vs ATI Radeon X800 GTO AGP
4
AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
5
AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
6
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 210
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
8
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA L20
9
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition vs ATI Radeon X1950 PRO DUAL
10
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy