Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1 vs AMD Radeon R9 280

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1 vs AMD Radeon R9 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (185W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1
2.842 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280 +17%
3.344 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2012
Release Date
Mar 2014
Southern Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
827 MHz
-
Boost Clock
933 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

24
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
1792
96
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.86 GPixel/s
88.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.842 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.344 TFLOPS
710.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
836.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

185W
TDP
200W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Tahiti
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy