Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 vs ATI FireMV 2250

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 vs ATI FireMV 2250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 85W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2012
Release Date
Jan 2007
Southern Islands
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
-
48
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

25.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1229 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
307.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

85W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV516
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy