Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 vs AMD FirePro W4300

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 vs AMD FirePro W4300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2
1.229 TFLOPS
FirePro W4300 +16%
1.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2012
Release Date
Dec 2015
Southern Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

25.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1229 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
307.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Bonaire
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy