Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 vs AMD FireStream 9250

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (85W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 +22%
1.229 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2012
Release Date
Jun 2008
Southern Islands
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
800
48
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

25.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1229 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
307.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV770
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy