Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (85W vs 375W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2
1.229 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X2 +233%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2012
Release Date
Unknown
Southern Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2048
48
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

25.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1229 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
307.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
375W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Tahiti
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy