Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 7950 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB

AMD Radeon HD 7950 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 and 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 16 MB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 7950 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 2.656GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 200W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2012
Release Date
Unknown
Southern Islands
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
166 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
16MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
2.656GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
-
112
TMUs
2
32
ROPs
2
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

25.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.0 MPixel/s
89.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.0 MTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.867 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
716.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
VSA-101
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
GPU Variant
Daytona (355-0025-221)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
180 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²

Board Design

200W
TDP
15W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
6.0
4.6
OpenGL
1.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy