Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 8250 IGP vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU

AMD Radeon HD 8250 IGP vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon HD 8250 IGP and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 8250 IGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (8W vs 15W)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 175% (1100MHz vs 400MHz)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 8250 IGP
0.102 TFLOPS
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU +1280%
1.408 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2013
Release Date
Sep 2020
Temash
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
400 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
2
Compute Units
-
128
Shading Units
640
8
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
20
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.00 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.816 TFLOPS
102.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1408 GFLOPS
6.400 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
352.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Kalindi
GPU Name
Tiger Lake GT2
Kalindi LP
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.178 billion
Transistors
Unknown
110 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Board Design

8W
TDP
15W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy