Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 8350 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

AMD Radeon HD 8350 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 8350 OEM and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 8350 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 35W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.00GB/s vs 10.67GB/s)
432 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 8350 OEM
0.104 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +1100%
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2013
Release Date
Jun 2017
Sea Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
667 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
10.67GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
5.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
104.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

19W
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cedar
GPU Name
Lexa
-
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy