AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP vs AMD FirePro A300
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon HD 8400 IGP and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (25W vs 65W)
AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
Boost Clock905MHz
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 8400 IGP
0.154 TFLOPS
FirePro A300
+351%
0.695 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2013
Release Date
Jun 2012
Kabini
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
760 MHz
-
Boost Clock
905 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
2
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
128
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.240 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
153.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
695.0 GFLOPS
9.600 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
25W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Kalindi
GPU Name
Devastator
-
GPU Variant
A300
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
32 nm
1.178 billion
Transistors
1.303 billion
110 mm²
Die Size
246 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0
