Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 8990 OEM and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1832 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 8990 OEM +664%
4.096 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2013
Release Date
Sep 2008
Sea Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

950 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
448bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
2048
Shading Units
216
128
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
182W
750 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Malta
GPU Name
GT200
Malta XT (215-0849026)
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
365 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy