AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA GRID A100B
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 and 48GB VRAM GRID A100B to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 69% (1700MHz vs 1005MHz)
More VRAM (64GB vs 48GB)
Lower TDP (300W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 1638GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI210
+62%
22.63 TFLOPS
GRID A100B
13.89 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2021
Release Date
May 2020
Radeon Instinct
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
64GB
Memory Size
48GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
4096bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
1638GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s
Render Config
104
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
108
6656
Shading Units
6912
416
TMUs
432
0
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
707.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
181.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
400W
700 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Aldebaran
GPU Name
GA100
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
7 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
N/A
Shader Model
N/A
