Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 55% (1700MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (64GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
6016 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI210 +1510%
22.63 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2021
Release Date
Dec 2015
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

64GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1638GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

104
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
6656
Shading Units
640
416
TMUs
40
0
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
707.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
181.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
55W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GM107
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
Unknown
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy