Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB

AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 and 4GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (64GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 34.14GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (10W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI210 +3435%
22.63 TFLOPS
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
0.64 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2021
Release Date
Mar 2023
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1067 MHz

Memory

64GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
LPDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1638GB/s
Bandwidth
34.14GB/s

Render Config

104
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
6656
Shading Units
512
416
TMUs
16
0
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
16
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
707.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
181.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1280 GFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
640.0 GFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
320.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
10W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GA10B
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
8 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
N/A
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy