AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (300W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
More VRAM (128GB vs 64GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 1638GB/s)
6656 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI210
22.63 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250
+100%
45.26 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2021
Release Date
Nov 2021
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
64GB
Memory Size
128GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
4096bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
1638GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s
Render Config
104
Compute Units
208
-
-
-
6656
Shading Units
13312
416
TMUs
832
0
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
707.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
181.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
362.1 TFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.26 TFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.26 TFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
500W
700 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Aldebaran
GPU Name
Aldebaran
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
6 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
N/A
Shader Model
N/A
