Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 and 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 42% (1700MHz vs 1200MHz)
More VRAM (64GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI210 +183%
22.63 TFLOPS
RTX A2000
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2021
Release Date
Aug 2021
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
562 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

64GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
192bit
1638GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

104
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
26
6656
Shading Units
3328
416
TMUs
104
0
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
707.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
181.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
70W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GA106
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
8 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
12 billion
Unknown
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
N/A
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy