Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1700MHz vs 1612MHz)
More VRAM (64GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI210 +174%
22.63 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
8.253 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1117 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

64GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1638GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

104
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
6656
Shading Units
2560
416
TMUs
80
0
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
707.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
181.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
60W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GA107S
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
8 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
N/A
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy